Google

What do you think of the idea of ??Prince Charles William circumvent the throne?

Written on:May 3, 2011
Comments
Add One

What are the reasons for and against this idea? And just how could Charles be allowed to leave?


9 Comments add one

  1. ⁙thatgirl⁙ says:

    Why? He is next in line for the throne is not he?

  2. esmerelda says:

    I think Charles would have to resign and I can not see why he would want. . . and William is a bit young to be king. It probably will not be a problem for a long time, though. . . The Queen Mother lived to 102, right? And Elizabeth II seems to take after her mother.

  3. scoutma53 says:

    I have no problem with this. Charles is not very popular and very old when the queen dies. On the other hand, his whole life, all the benefits of the future king, and really do something to deserve it. I do not think they can just skip him, but he could not refuse to take the crown, or shortly after leaving office, like his great uncle has – this would be the hassle of another coronation in rapid succession mean.

  4. Aceline Deschamps says:

    Wow! How many times this is requested at the last two weeks!? He can not. He will not. It can not happen. It is against the law. The line of the entry is what it is. It will not be gewijzigd.Charles the Prince of Wales. That means, if Elizabeth dies, and he lives, he will be king. There is no skipping generations unless he first sterft.periode.Einde of the statement.

  5. capitalgentleman says:

    One of the great things about the British monarchy is that the long tradition and history. In almost 1000 years, no one has ever beaten a generation for their child. This is just “not done” as the Brits would say, even though it may be perfectly legal. Laws in the UK are so much about what is done, like what is written. Thus, Charles will not step aside, and neither would he. When you start messing around with a 1000 year old institution, which will stop the changes?

  6. Fiq Faysee says:

    I’ve heard some buzz on the net that the Queen has an outstanding side was asked to examine this possibility as she is afraid that if Charles puts his derier on the throne will be time for some accident happening to Prince William and his half-borhter Prince Hewitt will be the next in line. Since this calls for DNA testing and the inevitable revelations of illegitimacy the House of Windsor would crumble. By leapfrog Charles, William would have a chance? Heir and defeat the possibility of producing a Hewitt assuming the throne of England.

  7. Lord Lucan says:

    It will never happen, dear girl. Camilla has already purchased her coronation outfit Littlewoods online. Would a desire to rob her of her special day?

  8. Lili says:

    I can no good reason. First, Charles is the best trained, best prepared Prince of Wales in history, and he spent his life preparing the troon.In the second, the monarch has virtually no power anyway. He or she is essentially only a symbol, a boegbeeld.En in the third, Charles will probably be king for lang.U can be sure that Prince William does not want to be king before he can help. His cooperation would be necessary if Charles decided not to become king, and I doubt he would geven.De queen, by the way, can not be a unilateral decision about her son. It would be an Act of Parliament to fool around with the succession, and Charles has done nothing to justify this. There is no reason to think that the Queen would pass over Charles. Tradition in which the monarchy in general and the line of succession in particular is especially important for haar.Terug the abdication of the queen’s uncle has occurred, there was talk among the courtiers and politicians trying to second son , the Queen’s father, the third pass, Prince George, Duke of Kent, who had a son and who was thought by some better suited for the role of the king than Prince Albert. The idea was dropped, but the whole experience of the abdication was very messy. There is no reason to create unnecessary problems they, and they are not necessarily where Charles is concerned.

  9. terri says:

    Prince Charles should be king as England became the way he is the rightful next in line. However, public opinion seems to be against Camilla becoming queen, because of still popular image of Diana. I think if Charles now wife, Camilla is the law of marriage, the future queen or the public likes it or not. I would like to see this, but only for a few years, then William and Kate take the throne.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Pylon Ltd