PostHeaderIcon The Olympics: a Fist for Freedom


The  provide a stage for the entire  to, not only watch sports, but also fight for beliefs.  Yet in recent Olympic history, the has ignored the true calling of the .

The 2008 comes at a time when the first African American is running for the U.S. Presidency, is fighting for freedom from , and is searching for its identity from the coalition, among many other issues.  Why then has the Olympic Committee decided to hold the in ?

Given the current state of international affairs, many human beings do not respect the decision to hold the in

On the other hand,  may be the perfect place to make a political statement. 

Often times, athletes in the are fighting for rights or freedoms in their home countries.  If the believes that has violated human rights and freedoms, then what better place is there to bring the ’s eyes to the attention of human injustice?  And who better to protest than the athletes themselves?

The 1968 is a perfect example of how a controversial location and an unstable international climate could lead to an everlasting memory of the human spirit and a symbol of rights and freedom for oppressed people across the globe.

City was a turbulant place when the moved in.  And 1968 was a time of wars and international unrest— itself was fighting an internal freedom struggle. 

The war was in full swing entering its ninth year and Martin Luther King Jr. died shortly before the in April of 1968. The , alongside of , would mourn.

City was plagued with violence.  Many young citizens of believed the was a waste of social funding and authority.  Mexican student protesters were massacred a few days before the and nearly 300 died. 

The ’s eyes were on the 1968 not only for the joy and fuffilment of watching the athletes and believing in passion but also because of the international and political climate of the time.

San Jose University African American track runners, John Carlos and Tommie , understood then that this was an opportunity for them to peacefully protest the injustices of the U.S. racial system and the hopelessness of human rights injustices around the .

took the gold with an impressive 19.5 second 200 meter run.  Carlos finished with a bronze.

The two solemnly walked to the podium where they were adorned with flowers and medals. Both men wore black socks with no shoes and sported human rights badges.  They climbed the podium and their black socks clashed with the white boxes beneath their feet.

Slowly the national anthem began to play.  Both men bowed their heads and proudly raised a fist encased in a black glove into the air in the black power salute. 

These men were good enough to compete for their country but were not good enough to share the liberties that other Americans enjoyed. They understood that.

They used the controversial stage set at the City to their advantage.

While they were barred from further competition in the and were not heroically received in the U.S., Carlos and are looked upon as heroes of the civil rights movements and heroes of human rights around the .

, much like City, is a controversial place to hold the .  The war, much like the War, is a controversial war.  The Tibetan Freedom Fight, much like the African American Freedom Fight, is one that the is watching.

If the actions of two men in the 1968 in City can be a part of the reason why an African American man can run for the 2008 presidential seat, then is the perfect stage to set the

The should not boycott the for its location—instead the should celebrate the athletes who made the games, and the athletes should use the to make a small, yet meaningful, difference.


http://www.ishoesclub.com/olympic/html/article_90.html

Related posts

Leave a Reply

Powered by Yahoo! Answers